Joanne O’Shea
Call: 2000
Joanne O’Shea
Middle Temple
FLBA
Direct Access
Accredited Mediator
Vulnerable Witness Trained
Legal Aid Supplier Number 942MD
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Joanne O’Shea practises exclusively in Family Law.
Joanne is an experienced family practitioner who is regularly instructed in cases of considerable complexity covering the full spectrum of Children Act proceedings where she represents parents/ grandparents and guardians ad litem. Joanne has specialised in Children Act proceedings for over 15 years and has an insightful and sensitive approach while robustly representing her clients to achieve the best outcomes.
There is a frequent overlap between Children Act and criminal proceedings where Joanne’s previous practice in crime gives her further insight and advantage.
Joanne is a well-respected member of the Family Team at Broadway House Chambers; she has extensive and broad experience in terms of her legal knowledge and client care.
Joanne’s experience as a practitioner enables her to be incisive, practical and pragmatic in order to resolve cases effectively for clients including resolving matters by way of agreed orders with represented and non-represented parties.
Joanne is registered with the Bar Council to undertake direct access work.
Reputation
Joanne hosts seminars for Broadway House Chambers. Joanne speaks at the Family Law Annual Conference and discusses care and private children in the family law webinar series. Seminars have included but are not limited to:
• Children Act Updates
• Private Law: Parental Alienation from a Practitioner’s Perspective
• Role of courts and social workers in care proceedings; role of Official Solicitor
Client testimonials:
“Joanne was amazing, she really is a talented barrister, and so considerate and easy to work with. I really appreciated working with her.”
“Client over the moon with the outcome.”
“Joanne was amazing and achieved everything I wanted.”
“Thorough and searching in cross examination whilst being tactful and sensitive.”
Expertise
Private Law
Joanne has a wealth of experience in representing parents and children in all private law matters at all court levels ranging from s8/Child arrangement orders, internal and international relocation cases, same sex parent cases, to complex multi- party fact find cases where alienation and fabricated sexual abuse allegations feature.
Public Law
Joanne undertakes a wide range of Public Law work; she represents parents and children at all levels including at High Court and Court of Appeal. She has a wide range of experience in all key areas which include FGM, inflicted injuries and neglect cases. She has also conducted public law proceedings through the Official Solicitor.
Notable Cases
Wakefield (2023)
Child Arrangement Order application by father. Representing father. Mother opposed father’s application for shared care on basis of child’s young age, her primary relationship with the child and the low level of contact agreed to date by mother. Both parents local to one another. Shared care highly workable and no welfare issues. Justices made shared care order made.
Newcastle (2023)
Enforcement/ CAO application by father. Representing mother. Father acted as a litigant in person. Resolved orders by agreement.
York (2023)
Enforcement/ Child arrangement application by father. Representing mother. Father acted as litigant in person. Resolved matters by agreement at first hearing.
Scarborough (2023)
Child arrangement application by father. Finding of fact hearing listed. Findings made against father. Father completed DAPP. Mother psychologically assessed as traumatised by father’s conduct. Mother needed very specific therapy before being able to consider or manage contact between father and child. No contact recommended including indirect. Father’s application for contact dismissed.
Multi day final hearing, York Circuit Judge (2022)
North American parents. Representing mother. Mother residing in UK and father in North America. Father applied for child arrangements in which he sought that the complex and multifaceted terms of the agreed non-UK contact order (now was some years old) be adopted in their entirety by the court in England and Wales. Court refused this. It case managed the matter by directing a s7 report and made an order based on the welfare checklist and the current interests of the child. Key was the child’s age, their educational status and also independently reported maturity. Parents agreed that some elements of the non UK order were integrated in the order but the key schedule for contact with father and when they visit him abroad was driven by the child.
Multi day Fact Find Lincoln (2022)
Represented father where mother had alleged domestic abusive in terms of coercive control, excessive drinking, over chastisement of the children and rape. No findings made of the above. Ultimate outcome was that father’s unsupervised contact was restored with an order for overnights in term time and holiday contact.
Relocation Case, Middlesbrough (2021)
Multi day hearing. Representing father where Mother’s application was to relocate with children from Teesside to Home Counties. Shared care already in place for children in Teesside. Application refused on basis of ages of children, their wishes and feelings, disruption/harm caused by the proposed move and the need to maintain a close and consistent relationship with both parents. Term time contact, if the children moved, would be insufficient to maintain relationship with father and would have detrimental effect on the children. Concern that children may become resentful of frequent travel and contact arrangements to Teesside. Shared care order continued.
Clerks
