Alexander Modgill
Call: 2002
Alexander Modgill
LL.B. (Hons) (University of London)
LL.M. (University of London)
Bar Vocational Course
College of Law London (2002)
Lincoln’s Inn, ELA
Legal Aid Supplier Number 133HP
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Alex Modgill is a prominent member of Broadway House Chambers’ Family and Civil Law teams. He is a barrister of over 18 years’ standing and has consistently been recommended as a leading practitioner by the Legal 500. He was appointed to the Attorney General’s Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown from 2012 to 2018.
Reputation
Appointed to the Attorney General’s Panel of Junior Counsel to the Crown from 2012 to 2018.
Regular speaker at Chambers’ law seminars.
Individual entry in the Legal 500 for over 12 years.
- Alex Modgill “provides robust advice” – Legal 500 UK
- “Always very thorough and well prepared, and consistently produces good results” – Legal 500 UK
Expertise
Family
Alex is an integral member of Broadway House Chambers’ Top Tier-rated Family Law Team. His practice covers all aspects of financial proceedings, from matrimonial finance, claims under the Civil Partnership Act 2004, the Inheritance Act 1975, the Married Women’s Property Act 1882, and the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. He is regularly instructed to advise and represent parties and intervenors in financial proceedings, including trusts and estoppel cases.
Alex is often instructed in high value cases including those involving complex business structures, family trusts and inheritances. Alex’s reputation in this area is characterised by his legal knowledge, the depth of his preparation and his attention to crucial detail.
Business, Property and Probate
Alex Modgill has a strong civil law practice. In commercial and chancery matters he advises and acts in cases involving freehold and leasehold property ownership, trusts (including TOLATA 1996 proceedings), contractual matters and the sale of goods and services. Alex is frequently asked to draft pleadings and advise on liability and quantum, especially in high-value cases.
Alex has considerable experience in personal injury law: he is regularly instructed in cases regarding employers’ liability, public and occupier’s liability, and road traffic accidents.
Notable Cases
A v A, B and C [2022]
Represented B and C, intervenors in financial remedy proceedings between A and A, at a 6-day hearing. Complex issues including trusts, proprietary estoppel, debts and freezing injunctions (s. 37 MCA 1973) relating to several residential and commercial properties, shareholdings in businesses and other assets in the UK, plus other alleged assets overseas.
B v B [2022]
4-day hearing involving high value assets including real property, shares in a business with a greatly disputed value, high income, family commitments in England and overseas.
B v B [2020]
Financial remedy proceedings, large asset case including high income professional parties, large pensions in UK and Europe. Expert evidence regarding the implementation of pension sharing regarding a pension in Europe.
A v A [2019]
Financial remedy proceedings, high asset case, long marriage, shares in a private oil company in England with subsidiary in Asia.
F v G [2021-22]
Advised and represented the Respondent in complex claims brought by one formerly engaged party against another under MWPA 1887, MC(PM)A 1958, MPPA 1970, and LR(MP)A 1970. Beneficial interests alleged in two properties (plus equitable tracing) as a result of substantial contributions in money or money’s worth.
R v S [2021]
Advised and successfully represented the claimant at a very complicated, potentially career-threatening 10-day employment tribunal hearing in claims for unfair dismissal. Significant issues about non-disclosure.
Clerks
Nick Power
Call: 2004 (Solicitor 1998)
Nick Power
BA (Hons) Law and European Business Studies
FLBA
Arbitrator
Legal Aid Supplier Number 106UQ
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Nick is a highly sought after financial remedy specialist with over 20 years’ experience. He is regularly instructed by solicitors across the north of England who welcome his expertise and team approach. He is recognised as a “first choice junior for many solicitors handling money work” and is also instructed as a neutral evaluator for private FDR’s.
Reputation
Having been ranked in legal directories for over 15 years, the latest editions rank Nick highly as follows:
Legal 500 – 2023
Tier 1
“A junior with a first-class mind who is great in all areas of financial remedy proceedings. He has an exceptional eye for detail”
Chambers and Partners – 2023
Band 1
“Nick Power is noted for his prowess in handling diverse and complex financial remedy proceedings and family separations often involving pensions, properties and inherited wealth. He is particularly skilled at handling cases with overseas assets and further assists clients with private FDR.”
Legal 500 – 2022
Tier 1
“A highly skilled negotiator and advocate. He provides sound, measured advice and has a good rapport with clients”
Chambers and Partners – 2022
Band 1
Rises in the rankings based on his prowess in handling diverse and complex financial remedy proceedings and family separations often involving pensions, properties and inherited wealth. He is particularly skilled at handling cases with overseas assets and further assists clients with private FDR.
“He has a really good manner with clients and can explain complicated matters in a really easy way.”
“He has a team approach which consists of himself, the instructing solicitor and the client.”
“He is sharp, on the ball and enthusiastic, as well as great with clients.”
Legal 500 – 2021
“Nick is a strong advocate and is my barrister of choice for financial remedy cases. He is always very well prepared and is very thorough in his approach. Again, he provides sensible and realistic advice and instils confidence in clients and instructing solicitors.”
Legal 500 – 2020 – Band 1 of Leading Juniors
Chambers and Partners – 2021
“Highly accomplished family law barrister who concentrates on financial remedy cases, especially those with offshore earnings, pensions and business issues. His instructions often concern assets spread over multiple jurisdictions.”
Strengths: “He manages expectations very well and has a reassuring effect on the client. He’s very balanced when presenting the case.”
“He has the rare ability to distil a complex situation into simple issues.”
“He has a lovely reassuring manner with the client and is very calm and focused but tough in court. He’s just a brilliant advocate.”
Chambers and Partners – 2020
“Highly accomplished family law barrister who concentrates on financial remedy cases, especially those with offshore earnings, pensions and business issues. His instructions often concern assets spread over multiple jurisdictions.
Strengths: “Nick has the very valuable skill of distilling complex situations down into the key issues.” “Well-prepared with an excellent grasp on the issues as well as a confident manner with clients.” “Ideal for a range of financial orders applications”
Expertise
Nick’s practice encompasses all aspects of financial remedy proceedings including applications for financial provision for children under the Children Act 1989 Schedule 1. He is regularly instructed to advise prior to the issue of proceedings and is committed to alternative dispute resolution where appropriate. He has extensive experience of representing business owners, professionals and their spouses, as well as third parties, in cases where the assets are up to £10m. His case load regularly involves the following issues:-
- Property portfolios
- Companies and business interests
- Significant pension assets
- Inherited assets
- Assets outside the jurisdiction including overseas Trusts
- Complex income structures including those offshore
- Farms
- Trusts
- Third party applications and dispute over ownership of assets
Notable Cases
- Recent cases have included:-
- Disputed actuarial evidence in relation to pension sharing and the instruction of separate experts
- An overseas trust and pre-nuptial agreement
- Significant offshore earnings
- Company and property holdings with arguments as to non-matrimonial property and post-separation accrual
Clerks
Sharn Samra
Call: 2002
Sharn Samra
LL.B. (Hons)(London School of Economics), 2:1
Bar Vocational Course (2002), Very Competent
Member of Lincoln’s Inn
Recorder of the Family Court (North Eastern Circuit)
Recorder of the Financial Remedies Court (North Eastern Circuit)
Deputy District Judge (Civil and Private Children: North Eastern Circuit)
Member of FLBA
Legal Aid Supplier Number 162YG
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Sharn is a family law specialist and has developed a strong reputation across all areas of her practise during 20 years at the Bar. She is a formidable advocate who is known for both her meticulous case preparation and personable manner.
Reputation
Sharn regularly presents seminars to lawyers and non-lawyers both regionally and nationally. Recent presentations include: The Domestic Abuse Act 2021 and Fact-Finding Hearings within Public Law Proceedings.
Expertise
Family Law
Within financial remedy proceedings, Sharn is particularly renowned for her ability to grapple with complex finances and has considerable experience in multi-party cases involving third party interests and bankruptcy matters.
In public law cases, Sharn acts on behalf of all parties at all levels of the Family Court, including regular representation of Local Authorities. She has significant experience in cases involving an international element including forced marriage cases.
Within private law cases, Sharn has a long standing interest in cases involving domestic abuse and is known for her sensitivity in representing vulnerable parties for which she has undertaken specialist training.
Notable Cases
X v. Y [2022]: Sharn successfully represented a Mother within private law proceedings at a 5 day finding of fact hearing, securing all findings as sought in respect of domestic abuse against the Father. There was a central element of controlling and coercive behaviour. Special measures were sought on the Mother’s behalf and the issues highlighted in Re H-N were addressed.
A Local Authority v. S v. S v. S [2021]: Sharn represented the LA in respect of its application for a forced marriage protection order. Sharn provided ongoing advice and representation during the proceedings on issues of: habitual residence, jurisdiction and care planning. A forced marriage protection order was made at the conclusion of the proceedings and a transfer of jurisdiction to Romania.
A Local Authority v. X (A Mother) & Ors [2020] EWFC B7:Sharn represented the LA in its application for care and placement orders and was successfully able to persuade the court that deemed service could be granted in circumstances where direct personal service on the parents had not been possible.
A Local Authority v. B v. E v. E [2020]: Application for care and placement orders lasting over 2 years. Sharn represented the child throughout. The mother had a learning disability, requiring an interpreter and an intermediary. Listed for an 11 day hybrid final hearing in November 2020; care and placement orders made.
DS v. LS v. JS [2019]: Successful private law appeal on behalf of a grandmother against the decision of lay magistrates within private law proceedings. The case concerned an 8 year old who had lived with his grandmother for the majority of his life. The appeal was allowed and the case remitted with CAFCASS being invited to allocate a new officer; child stayed with grandmother.
Clerks
Asma Chaudhry
Call: 2003
Asma Chaudhry
Gray’s Inn
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02FBL
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Since being called to the Bar Asma’s practice has predominately been in Asylum, Immigration and Human Rights. She has extensive experience in Nationality and EEA Law. Asma has first-hand experience of initial application stage, appeal preparation and representing clients before the Tribunal.
Asma also undertakes a private children law practice.
She is a fluent speaker of Urdu, Punjabi, Pothwari and Mirpuri languages
Reputation
‘Asma's strengths include her command of the law, strategic thinking, oral advocacy, and attention to detail. She is incredibly client-focused’
(Legal 500, 2023)
‘Asma is a fierce advocate who articulates her arguments in a persuasive and eloquent manner. She has a strong eye for details and is very compassionate’
(Legal 500, 2022)
Expertise
Immigration
Asma has long standing experience of presenting complex Asylum, Immigration, EU Law and Human Rights appeals, including Deportation and Bail. She has experience across the spectrum dealing with very varied and unique cases. She is accessible for early instructions from solicitors and keen to work with them advising on how best to prepare cases to achieve the best outcome for clients. She is a true believer that preparation is key to success.
She has practical experience of appearing before the First Tier and Upper Tier Tribunal. Asma takes instructions in drafting grounds for permission to appeal and undertakes judicial review work. Asma is regularly instructed to present cases on behalf of the Secretary of the State for the Home Department.
Asma has invaluable experience and skill in representing vulnerable clients and victims of modern slavery, torture and children. She has a particular interest in representing females, and a focus on representing their Human Rights issues.
Private Children
Asma undertakes all areas of private children work.
Notable Cases
VK v SSHD
Appealed the Secretary of State’s decision to refuse the Appellant protection on the basis that he could return to Kazakhstan with an outstanding extradition request from Turkey. He was alleged to have been a FETO member - an organisation considered to be terrorist organisation in Turkey.
HHA v SSHD
Appealed the decision of the Secretary of the State to refuse protection to a Somali female who was found to have been persecuted by majority clan members. Substantial evidencefrom experts was provided in relation her being a victim of torture.
RP V SSHD
Successfully appealed the Secretary of State’s decision to refuse protection to a woman facing deportation to Pakistan after serving an 18 month custodial sentence for perverting the course of justice having fled a marriage due to domestic violence and was at risk of honor killing on Pakistan
AN V SSHD
Successfully appealed a decision to deport a Nigerian national after having served a 3.5 year custodial sentence for the use of firearms, on the basis of his family life with his British children in the United Kingdom.
TJ v SSHD
Deportation appeal decision challenged of a Norwegian national who was convicted of child related offences.
DP V SSHD
Albanian woman found to be a victim of modern slavery would be at risk of being re-trafficked upon return to Albania was granted protection.
SA v SSHD
Coptic Christian appeal dismissed by the First Tier successfully challenged and allowed by Upper Tier.
JG
Nigerian national brother wanting to join his sister in the UK who was a refugee and accepted to be a victim of human trafficking. Appeal allowed on the basis of exceptional circumstances.
LS V SSHD
Successful appeal for Appellant seeking protection from international criminal gangs in South America.
Clerks
Rachel Mellor
Call: 2004
Rachel Mellor
LL.B (Hons)
LL.M, Human Rights Law
Lincoln’s Inn
Attorney General’s Regional Panel A
Recorder
Fee-paid Employment Judge
Chambers & Partners
Legal Aid Supplier Number 181HG
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Rachel Mellor is an integral part of Broadway House Chambers’ Employment Law and Family Law Teams. Formerly a freelance advocate on the Midland and Western Circuits, she is a respected barrister who is a popular choice in cases involving complex areas of law.
Reputation
‘Rachel Mellor is a distinguished advocate who is highlighted for her handling of a range of employment cases including those concerning discrimination and unfair dismissal. She is friendly, professional and able to provide advice on complex subjects.A seasoned discrimination specialist."
(Chambers and Partners, 2023)
‘Rachel Mellor is a distinguished advocate who is highlighted for her handling of a range of employment cases including those concerning discrimination and unfair dismissal. She is recognised for her ability to draw from her human rights law knowledge. She is a very impressive barrister: confident and professional with clients and a strong advocate in hearings'
(Chambers and Partners, 2022)
Rachel is a member of the Attorney General Regional Panel as Panel A Counsel.
Rachel Mellor is a fee-paid Employment Judge of the Employment Tribunals (England and Wales), assigned to the North West Region (part-time).
Rachel is also a Recorder assigned to sit on the North Eastern Circuit dealing with family cases (part-time).
Rachel delivers webinars and seminars on behalf of Broadway House Chambers’ Family Law and Employment Law Teams. Recent seminars include:
Employment Law
- Breakfast @ Broadway – A monthly Employment Law Update
- Equality Act 2010 (2019)
- Annual Conferences:
- Employment Law- Privilege (2019)
- Employment Law- Continuity of Employment and the Impact of Furlough (2020)
- Interim Relief (2021)
Family Law
- Unregulated Placements - Public Law Children(2020)
- Adoption and Children (Coronavirus)(Amendment) Regulations (2020)
Expertise
Family
Rachel has practised family law since she joined Chambers in 2006 during which time she has built up extensive experience. For the last 5 years Rachel has specialised in Public Law proceedings and regularly receives instructions on behalf of Local Authorities, parents and children. Rachel has an understanding of the different needs of clients and tailors her approach accordingly; she is acutely aware that many parents are vulnerable, often with their own particular needs who require additional support. She welcomes the opportunity to meet with clients in advance of forthcoming hearings.
She appears at all levels of the Family Court and conducts cases ranging from neglect cases to complex cases involving multiple experts including inflicted injuries, child sex exploitation and sex abuse and removal from the jurisdiction.
In addition to her advocacy experience Rachel undertakes advisory work and is more than happy to assist with any drafting such as Part 25 applications or Human Rights claims for example in misuse of section 20 agreements.
Rachel also, along with the rest of the Broadway House Family Team, provides CPD training and delivers seminars both at the Annual Family Conference and in house at Solicitors’ offices.
Employment
Rachel has practised employment law since she joined Chambers in 2006 and has consequently built up varied and extensive experience this is reflected in her appointment to the Attorney General’s Panel of Counsel (employment law) in 2012. Representing both claimants and respondents in the Employment Tribunal she is regularly instructed on matters ranging from unfair dismissal to discrimination, parental rights, breach of contract and redundancy. Rachel has an interest in discrimination claims in particular disability and sex discrimination and has received instructions from wide ranging clients in these areas from individual claimant’s to public bodies such as NHS England, Local Government and schools.
As well as her advocacy experience Rachel undertakes advisory and drafting work including pre action and settlement agreements.
Along with the rest of Broadway House Employment Team she also provides CPD seminars and other training including mock tribunals which can be tailored towards both lawyers or non lawyers such as HR staff.
Notable Cases
Cyprien v Bradford Grammar School [2013] UKEAT 0306_12_1503
Disability discrimination – exclusions/jurisdiction – Jurisdictional points – claim in time – effective date of termination – negligent omissions of employer – application of principle in Mateuszowicz v Kingston upon Hull City Council – extension of time – whether just and equitable to extend time.
Clerks
Kiran Dhillon
Call: 2005
Kiran Dhillon
LL.B (Hons), King’s College, London (2004)
LL.M University College, London (2006)
Neville Laski Scholarship, Inner Temple (2006)
Inner Temple
Legal Aid Supplier Number 217XJ
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Kiran Dhillon previously practised in London and joined chambers in 2012. Since then, she has built up a strong practice in the following areas: Family and Civil law.
Reputation
Kiran is fluent in Punjabi.
Expertise
Family
Kiran Dhillon has established a busy practice in this field. She accepts instructions in private and public law Children Act 1989 matters and has experience in representing parents and Local Authorities in cases of considerable complexity. Kiran can be relied upon to combine frank yet sensitive advice in Children Act matters, as well as in cases where injunctive relief is sought. She is a robust advocate.
Civil
Kiran Dhillon has considerable expertise in civil litigation. Regularly instructed on fast and multi-track cases. Her practice covers both Claimant and Defendant work. Her attention to detail is consistently noted.
- Personal Injury law: cases ranging from employer’s liability and workplace injuries to road traffic accidents and infant approvals. She has been briefed in cases involving singular as well as multiple injuries and is often asked to advise on complex issues on liability and quantum. Kiran can be relied upon to produce high-quality statements of case and aims to complete paper briefs within 14 days of receipt.
- Medical Negligence: advises on prospects of success; drafts concise statements of case and aims to complete within 14 days of receipt of instructions.
- Breach of contract: examples of work- breach of restrictive covenants; payment of debt; consumer and commercial contracts. Has appeared in the Court of Appeal in a breach of contract matter.
- Costs: precedent cost budgets; advises on costs in general.
- Housing: regularly instructed in possession proceedings; acts both for tenants and landlords.
- Property: landlord and tenant disputes e.g. disrepair, possession, leases, freeholds, boundary disputes, easements etc.
Notable Cases
Represented a vulnerable young mother with mental health difficulties before the President of the Family Division, who referred to her as being “very capable”.
Represented a Local Authority in a baby shaking case, which resulted in multiple injuries, including retinal haemorrhages.
Represented a Mother accused of intentionally burning her young daughter.
Advised a Local Authority on jurisdiction- specifically on BAII not applying where there was a placement order application.
Represented a Father in prolonged private law proceedings (high level of adult conflict), which resulted in a transfer of residence in his favour.
Clerks
Abigail Langford
Call: 2005
Abigail Langford
LL.B (Hons), Leeds University (2003)
LL.M, Newcastle University (2005)
Lincoln’s Inn
Legal Aid Supplier Number 201LJ
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Abigail is Head of the Criminal Team and undertakes both prosecution and defence work across the North Eastern Circuit. A Grade 4 prosecutor and a member of the CPS Rape and Serious Sexual Assault Panel, she is experienced in dealing with cases involving vulnerable witnesses, particularly young witnesses and defendants. Abigail has a particular specialism in dealing with the Defendants with mental illness, including conducting conferences/ hearings in a hospital setting.
Reputation
Abigail is Head of the Criminal Team and regularly presents webinars to the CPS, the Police and Solicitors.
Expertise
Crime
Abigail deals with cases involving serious sexual offending both for the prosecution and the defence. Abigail is down to earth and has a pragmatic approach to dealing with complex cases. Abigail has a particular specialism in dealing with cases with complex disclosure issues for both the prosecution and defence. Abigail also has particular expertise in advising the police at investigation stage, and is well known for her expertise in issues of disclosure. Abigail has extensive experience in offences relating to firearms.
Abigail’s practice also extends to niche areas such as Mental Health Tribunals and Parole Board hearings.
Notable Cases
R v Mohsin Hussain (2023)
Prosecution of Mohsin Hussain for causing death by dangerous driving after 7-year-old boy was killed in Bradford. Hussain received nine years and nine months imprisonment. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-leeds-67512817
R v Dale Osborne (2023)
Prosecution of nine rapes, six actual bodily harm offences, one attempted rape, one sexual assault, three threats to kill and two false imprisonments. Defendant received 22 years imprisonment. https://www.westyorkshire.police.uk/news-appeals/man-jailed-multiple-rapes-bradford
R v Fanty and Others (2022)
Prosecution, Obtained convictions after trial of all Defendants on all counts for murder, attempted murder, conspiracy to possess modified firearms and ammunition with intent to endanger life, and conspiracy to supply controlled drugs of Class A.https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-south-yorkshire-61964013R v Taylor Meanley & ors (2021)
Drive-by shooting which led to the death of a 21 year old. Abigail’s main responsibility was dealing with the technical and phone evidence.
R v Anthony Atha (2021)
Successfully defended Anthony Atha who was tried in relation to an offence of murder. The defendant had mental health problems and he was the only defendant in the trial to be acquitted. The case was high profile.
R v Rehan Baig (2020)
Prosecuted man who admitted to having sexual intercourse with live chickens. There was video evidence.
https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/12969101/sick-dad-sex-familys-pet-chickens/
R v Matthew Herring [2019]
Prosecution of firearm discharge in Sheffield. Sentenced to 14 years.
R v Elizabeth Childs [2019]
Female defendant who stole £30,000 from children’s centre.
R v Ashraf Khan [2018]
Prosecuted defendant who fathered three children by his own daughter. The victim admitted to her husband on her deathbed that the father of the children was her father. Received a 4 year and a half year sentence.
R v R [2019]
Defence of a mentally impaired defendant in relation to serious sexual offending against young members of his family . The case involved consideration of both psychiatric and psychological expert evidence.
Clerks
Clare Walsh
Call: 2009
Clare Walsh
M.A. (Hons) Classics, University of Cambridge (2007, Upper Second Class)
Graduate Diploma in Law, BPP Law School, Leeds (2008)
Bar Vocational Course, BPP Law School, Leeds (2009, Very Competent)
Legal Aid Supplier Number 245TY
Clare is a member of the Criminal Bar Association.
In 2022, Clare was appointed as Deputy District Judge (Magistrates Courts)
Grade 3 Prosecutor
RASSO Panel
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Clare Walsh (née Benson) first joined Broadway House Chambers in 2009 as a pupil to Sophie Drake, now HHJ Sophie McKone. She accepted tenancy in 2010 and has remained at Broadway House Chambers ever since.
Clare practices predominantly in criminal law and is a regular feature in the Crown Courts of Yorkshire. She also has significant experience in regulatory matters, as well as mental health and prison law.
In addition to her busy practice, Clare now sits as a Deputy District Judge in the Magistrates’ Courts.
Clare is on the RASSO panel and is a Grade 3 prosecutor.
Reputation
In May 2017, Clare wrote an article entitled “The impact of the Ched Evans case on the law surrounding a Complainant’s sexual history” which can be found on the Broadway House website.
In July 2020 Clare gave a presentation on Cross-Admissibility at the Broadway House Annual Prosecution Seminar.
Expertise
Crime
Clare prosecutes and defends in the Crown Court in all areas of crime. She regularly deals with cases involving violence and is often instructed in matters involving young and vulnerable witnesses. Clare’s experience in the Crown Court ranges all the way from cases involving assault occasioning actual bodily harm, robbery, benefit fraud and indecent image offences, to s.18 wounding with intent, aggravated burglary and armed robbery, the supply of drugs, possession of firearms, high value fraud and serious sexual offences.
Clare has recent experience as Led Junior for both the Prosecution and the Defence.
Clare is on the RASSO panel and is a Grade 3 prosecutor.
Clare is also often instructed for the Defence as lone Junior in matters of serious sexual offences.
Sports Law
Clare joined the Sports Law Team as a consequence of her experience in disciplinary and regulatory proceedings in other professional fields. She also has a keen interest in Anti-Doping.
Clare’s experience as a criminal advocate has meant she has developed a particular interest in how the media treat those involved in sport who are accused of crimes and how this affects their careers.
Regulation + Judicial Review
In addition to her busy criminal law practice Clare has experience of representing lay clients and Local Authorities in taxi licensing matters and in environmental law cases. She has significant experience representing clients in Mental Health Act tribunals. Clare also practices in prison law and has appeared in Disciplinary and Parole Board hearings. Clare has also appeared before the Nursing and Midwifery Council on behalf of registrants in both interim and full hearings.
Notable Cases
COURT OF APPEAL (Criminal Division)
R v Iqbal (Rashid) [2022] – Clare represented this Appellant convicted of historical sexual offences. The appeal centred on the way the sentencing Judge had dealt with the issue of totality. The Court of Appeal agreed with her submissions in this regard and reduced the overall sentence from 12 to 10 years.
R v Craggs (Patrick John) [2018] EWCA Crim 1117 - Clare represented this Defendant, charged with Causing Serious Injury by Dangerous Driving and multiple Hanoi burglaries. The case involved issues surrounding fitness to plead, credit for plea and ultimately, when it came to sentence, matters of totality. There were sensitive matters to raise in mitigation. Following sentencing in the Crown Court, Clare took the case to the Court of Appeal (Criminal Division), where she successfully persuaded the Court that the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive, resulting in the total period of imprisonment being reduced from 12 years 2 months to 7 years 2 months.
CROWN COURT
R v Feve, Wattam and ors (2023) Led junior and successfully prosecuted defendants for Murder, Manslaughter and Perverting the Course of Justice.News coverage: https://www.grimsbytelegraph.co.uk/news/grimsby-news/kian-feve-guilty-murdering-jack-8960407 and https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c2e20rv7g22o
R v W (2021) Clare was led Junior for the Defence in this trial for Murder.
R v C (2021) Clare represented a young woman who pleaded guilty on the day of trial to a matter of Assisting an Offender, where her co-accused stood convicted of Attempt Murder and ultimately received a sentence exceeding 15 years. Clares client was made subject of a Suspended Sentence Order.
R v C (2021) Clare was led Junior for the Prosecution in this trial involving historical serious sexual offences against multiple victims. There were issues involving loss of historical ABE interviews and accounts, as well as hearsay and cross-admissibility. The case resulted in convictions on all Counts and the Defendant receiving a sentence of over 28 years’ imprisonment.
R v W (2018) Clare represented the Defendant in this complex POCA matter in which the benefit figure exceeded £4,000,000 and in which it was alleged there were hidden assets. Ultimately the available amount was agreed at just over £85,000, which was half what the Prosecution had originally applied for.
R v H & B (2017) Clare prosecuted this case in which a firearm was discharged in a busy nightclub, causing injury to a bystander. One of the Defendants, H, took the matter to trial. The case involved consideration of a large amount of CCTV, all of which had to be presented to a jury. Furthermore, following sentencing, Clare advised the Crown as to the unduly lenient sentencing of H. Based on this advice, the case was taken up by Treasury Counsel who successfully presented the matter before the Court of Appeal.
Clerks
Paul Smith
Call: 2008
Paul Smith
B.A. (Hons) History & Politics, University of York (2005)
LL.M. Law, University of Leeds (2007)
Inaugural Gray’s Inn ICSL Scholarship Award Winner (2007)
Junior Counsel to the Crown (2015 to date)
Equality and Human Rights Commission panel member (2019-2023)
Employment Lawyers Association
Employment Law Bar Association
Gray’s Inn
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Paul Smith is an employment law specialist who acts in complex Employment Tribunal litigation in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. He also has experience of acting in appeals to the EAT, as well as the High Court and the Court of Appeal in employment matters. In 2015 he was appointed Junior Counsel to the Crown in relation to employment cases by the Attorney General (on the regional B panel).
Paul is recommended as Tier 1 barrister for employment law in the 2022 edition of the Legal 500 UK, with the editors noting that “Paul has an encyclopaedic knowledge of employment law. He is intellectually powerful and explains things in a very clear and concise way to clients.” He has also been recommended in Chambers & Partners UK Bar 2022, with clients commenting that, "He's an excellent barrister: forensic, knowledgeable and practical in the factors he considers” and that “He has that dogged determination and the tenacity to get the best result for the client." Paul has appeared in the Legal 500 UK in every edition since he qualified, in 2011.
Paul Smith is accredited under the Bar Public Access Scheme and may accept instructions directly from members of the public in employment matters. Please contact the Clerking Team for further information about BPAS and how to instruct barristers in this way.
Reputation
Legal 500 UK Tier 1
“An exceptional court advocate, who is highly personable and also provides carefully considered, commercial advice” (2023)
“Paul has an encyclopaedic knowledge of employment law. He is intellectually powerful and explains things in a very clear and concise way to clients” (2022)
Paul Smith “has an excellent breadth of knowledge across the field of employment law” (2020)
Clients like his “approachability and dedication to cases” (2017)
He is “a committed and enthusiastic young barrister” (2015)
He “quickly grasps the key issues” (2014)
Chambers & Partners UK
"Paul Smith is an employment law expert with experience representing clients in tribunals across the country. He frequently works in cases relating to breach of contract, equal pay, unfair dismissal and whistle-blowing. He acts for both claimants and respondents" (2023).
"He's an excellent barrister: forensic, knowledgeable and practical in the factors he considers" (2022)
"He has that dogged determination and the tenacity to get the best result for the client" (2022)
"Clear, concise and tenacious in his approach, his excellent breadth of knowledge is a real asset when dealing with unusual and complex matters" (2022)
Expertise
Paul Smith is a popular choice for solicitors across the full range of employment matters and regularly appears against senior practitioners and QCs. His Employment Tribunal practice covers complex unfair dismissal and discrimination cases through to disputes concerning whistleblowing, part-time working, equal pay and TUPE. He is often instructed in hearings lasting in excess of two weeks.
Paul has experience of appellate work and has appeared for corporate, group and individual clients in both the Employment Appeal Tribunal and the Court of Appeal. He also advises and appears in the High Court in injunctive relief actions arising from restrictive covenants in contracts of employment, the misuse of confidential information by employees, and in respect of notice pay claims.
Notable Cases
Advising a large care home operator in relation to a compulsory Covid-19 vaccination policy and defending claims brought against it as a result of action taken under the policy (2021 to date)
Hussain v Home Office, Leeds ET (2021). 8-day unfair dismissal claim brought by an employee who had been the subject of an anti-corruption investigation but an unsuccessful criminal prosecution. Paul Smith represented the Home Secretary.
Stockdale v Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd, Middlesbrough ET (July 2021). 8-day unfair dismissal claim brought on the grounds of Trade Union activities, fulfilling the role of a Trade Union health and safety official, and whistleblowing. Paul Smith represented the Claimant.
Duxbury v University of Huddersfield, Leeds ET (April 2021). 11-day unfair dismissal and indirect age discrimination challenge to the employer’s compulsory PhD policy and the dismissal that resulted from the application of the policy. Paul Smith represented the University.
Butt & others v Reading Borough Council, Court of Appeal (October 2020). Paul Smith acted as junior counsel, led by Daphne Romney QC, in an appeal concerning the interpretation of claim forms in order to ascertain whether a claim could be said to exist.
Ehsan v Markazi Jamait ahl-e-Hadith, EAT (September 2020). Paul Smith successfully appealed a first instance decision in a wages claim which concerned the definition of “deduction” and whether that included payments said to have been made to the employer. Paul Smith represented the mosque.
GT v RV, London Central ET (2019-20). Paul Smith represented the Claimant in claims of unfair dismissal, victimisation, failure to make reasonable adjustments and disability-related harassment, in an 8-day trial. The claims were subject to r.94 restrictions and proceeded under the Employment Tribunals (National Security) Rules of Procedure.
Bassey v Revenue Commissioners & 11 others, Leeds ET (July 2019). Paul Smith represented the employer and 11 named individuals in a 15-day hearing, successfully defending the Respondents against the Claimant’s complaints of whistleblowing unfair dismissal and detriment, race, sex and sexual harassment, direct discrimination and disability-related claims. The case involved determination of 88 distinct jurisdictional and substantive issues.
A v B & others, lLondon Central ET (February 2019). 81 claims of sexual harassment, plus claims of direct sex discrimination, victimisation and wrongful dismissal. The parties were all solicitors and the case featured in the national media. Paul Smith represented the Claimant in the 15-day hearing, unled, against a senior QC.
Birmingham City Council v Adams & others [2019] ICR 531, EAT. Part of the ongoing Birmingham equal pay litigation, this appeal concerned the interpretation of r.1(4) of the 2004 Employment Tribunal rules as to what must be included in a claim form for it to have been validly presented, and whether a failure to comply is jurisdictional. Paul Smith represented the employees.
Clerks
Abdul Latif Shakoor
Call: 2010
Abdul Latif Shakoor
LL.B (Hons), Law, University of Leeds (2008)
LL.M, Human Rights Law, University of Nottingham (2009 – Distinction)
Bar Vocational Course, BPP Law School (2010 – Outstanding)
Sir Thomas More Bursary (2009)
Lincoln’s Inn
Criminal Bar Association
North Eastern Circuit
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02CDV
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Abdul Shakoor joined Broadway House Chambers in September 2012 following the completion of his Criminal Law pupillage under the supervision of Giles Bridge. Since then, Abdul has developed a practice prosecuting and defending across a broad range of criminal offences in the Crown Court. He has also appeared successfully in the Court of Appeal on several occasions.
Reputation
Expertise
Abdul Shakoor has been practising at the Bar since 2012 and has a strong practice both prosecuting and defending. His practice encompasses the full range of criminal law, including serious violence, firearms, sexual offences and drug trafficking. In particular, he has a strong practice involving multi-handed drug conspiracies.
He is adept at conducting paperless trials and presenting cases to the jury digitally. He is also experienced in sensitive cases involving young and vulnerable witnesses.
Notable Cases
Operation M (November 2021)
Defence at trial in a multi-handed conspiracy to supply class A drugs in the Lancashire area.
Operation E 3 (June 2021)
Prosecution at trial in relation to supply of 6kg of cocaine involving multiple defendants.
Operation S (May 2021)
Defence at trial in a multi-handed conspiracy to supply class A drugs in the Accrington area.
Operation P (January 2020)
Led Junior. Defence at trial of youth charged with Assisting an Offender in the Denholme Murder Case.
Operation H (July 2019)
Defence in a large scale violent disorder in Halifax involving rival gangs.
Operation T (March 2019)
Defence at trial in a multi-handed conspiracy to burgle and steal. After a successful legal argument to exclude fingerprint evidence, the prosecution dropped the case before half time against Abdul’s client.
Operation D (January 2019 & February 2018)
Defence at trial and re-trial in a multi-handed case involving a historical sex grooming gang targeting vulnerable girls in care.
Operation P (December 2017)
Defence at trial in a large scale benefit fraud involving 37 defendants alleged to have submitted false claims for tax credits and housing and council tax benefits.
Clerks
Emily Ward
Call: 2011 - Deputy Head of the Family LawTeam
Emily Ward
LL.B (Hons) University of Manchester (2010, First Class) (six prizes)
Bar Professional Training Course (2011)
Middle Temple, Godfrey Heilpern Scholar
Deputy District Judge (2019) - Civil, Public & Private Children, and Financial Remedies
Arbitrator
Farquhar Committee Member
Transparency Implementation Group Member
Resolution FLBA
Secretary of Regional FLBA (Yorkshire & Humber)
Women in Law
International Association of Women Judges
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Emily is Deputy Head of the Family Team and has a strong, busy practice both on and off the North Eastern Circuit. She is a particularly sought after in matrimonial finance and cohabitation disputes, as well as complex children cases. Emily is consistently recognised as a leading junior in family law in the Legal 500 and Chambers & Partners. She has a keen eye for detail and quickly grasps the key issues in the case.
Emily is also a member of Broadway House Chambers’ Business, Property & Probate Team, and acts in cases where there is a cross-over in jurisdictions and issues.
Emily was appointed as a Deputy District Judge in 2019, at the age of 30, and she holds children (public and private law), civil and financial remedy tickets.
Keen on all forms of alternative dispute resolution, Emily is instructed to act for clients at round table meetings, mediations, private FDRs and early neutral evaluations, as well as arbitrations. She also acts as a Private FDR practitioner/evaluator in financial remedy, Schedule 1 and TOLATA cases, offering her assistance from an neutral perspective with the aim of assisting parties to reach a swift resolution to their disputes.
Emily frequently delivers CPD accredited seminars to groups of lawyers, and is regularly approached to conduct bespoke training in her areas of expertise. She is published in the Family Law Journal, is a case reviewer for Nagalro, Seen & Heard Journal, and has recently taken up the position of Blog Editor of the Financial Remedies Journal. Emily is a published author, being responsible for chapters in both ‘Cohabitation: Law, Practice and Precedents’ and ‘Butterworths Family Law Service’.
Able to accept instructions under the Direct Access scheme, Emily can also provide advice and representation direct to the public.
Reputation
• Author contributor of the leading text ‘Cohabitation: Law, Practice and Precedents’.
• Author contributor of two chapters in Butterworths Family Law Service.
• Lectures for Resolution, FLBA and the Judicial College, as well as for solicitors/lawyers.
• Blog Editor and a member of the Financial Remedies Journal Editorial Board.
• Multiple publications in Family Law Journal.
• Case reviewer for Nagalro.
• Consistently recommended as a Leading Junior in the legal directories since 2017:
‘A high quality junior.’ ‘She is a highly skilled advocate, knowledgeable, and clients like her down-to-earth manner and caring approach.’ ‘Emily is an outstanding advocate who is also fantastic with clients. She always goes the extra mile and works very hard on her written work.’ (2022)
‘A very talented junior, with an extremely bright future. She is a calm and measured advocate, who presents her clients' cases in a strong and persuasive manner. ’ (2022)
‘She punches well above her weight and is not afraid to tackle very complex cases and holds her own against senior opponents. Good knowledge of the law, very down to earth with clients, easy to contact with instructions provides excellent feedback on how a case has progressed or settled in court proceedings. Strong advocate.’ (2021)
‘She's superb - she's got a brain the size of Britain! She has worked on some complex cases where the chances of winning would be slim but pulled off some good results.’ ‘She is very down to earth and can put a client at ease within minutes. She's good at delivering difficult advice clearly.’ ‘She's just an all-round great performer and wise beyond her years.’ (2021)
‘She holds her own against far more senior opponents.’ (2020)
‘A rising star whose expertise spans a range of family law matters, with a focus on matrimonial finance and child-related cases. She represents parents and local authorities in various care proceedings which often involve complex medical evidence.’ ‘She is an exceptional advocate with a great eye for detail who consistently impresses with her representation in both financial and children proceedings.’ ‘She offers great client care and is fearless.’ (2020)
Expertise
Financial Remedy & Schedule 1
Emily is an established matrimonial finance specialist and is highly sought after in financial remedy and schedule 1 cases. She acts for clients from pre-issue, where focus is primarily upon strategy, settlement and advice as to evidence, through to final hearings and on appeal. Her case load comprises high net worth clients with large incomes and substantial capital, business, trust assets and/or extensive pension provision, as well as difficult cases where needs exceed the available assets.
Emily is experienced in advising in cases where the issues include pre-acquired wealth, inheritance, complex business and trust structures, liquidity issues and nuptial agreements. She is also often approached to advise in cases where there have been substantial personal injury awards. Her recent and current cases include:
• Advising in relation to a substantial discretionary family trust, created after a lottery win (+£9m).
• Representation of a party with significant company assets, including a limited company valuation of £5.9m.
• Securing findings of undisclosed assets and foreign income in China. Complex issues concerning jurisdiction and enforcement.
• Advising and drafting pre-nuptial agreement in a high value case with assets in the UK, Russia, Germany, Austria and Iran.
• Currently instructed in a case where assets exceed £12m.
Private Children
In addition, Emily’s family practice encompasses all areas Private Children Law. She advises and represents clients in a wide range of applications, and she is a favourite in cases involving intractable contact disputes, implacable hostility and vulnerable individuals. She is frequently praised for her sensitive yet sensible approach with clients. Recognised for her sensitive approach, Emily has dealt with a significant number of cases in which there has been a parent death or terminal diagnosis of a parent.
Emily also represents clients in cases involving domestic abuse, including coercive and controlling behaviour allegations and also cases where false allegations of abuse against parents and/or children have been made.
Her latest children cases include:
• Representation of a parent at a finding of fact hearing concerning multiple serious allegations of physical, psychological, emotional and sexual abuse against the resident parent and the children, including multiple rape and GBH.
• Representing two professional people at multi-day fact findings hearings in which allegations of coercive and controlling behaviour were found proved.
• Acting for a parent in a case where false allegations of sexual abuse were made against him, and found after trial to have been fabricated by the other parent.
• Acting for grandparents in a case where their son had been killed, contact with grandchildren stopped by the other parent and allegations of sexual abuse made against one of the grandparents. Findings of fabrication were made and contact was reinstated.
Civil
Emily’s civil law practice incorporates a range of matters, including land and trust disputes (to which she brings extensive legal knowledge from her authorship and editorship in leading practitioner cohabitation texts), Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependents) Act 1975 claims, and bankruptcy and insolvency in a family law context.
Given her family law practice, Emily has particular specialism in civil and chancery matters with a family element, including advising in professional negligence issues stemming from family law proceedings/advice and land and trust disputes in a family setting.
Emily’s recent cases include:
• Acting for a client resisting an application to annul his bankruptcy petition. Linked financial remedy proceedings.
• Representing an intervener in civil proceedings (the family proceedings having been stayed pending the outcome of the civil dispute) concerning various property transactions and arguments as to beneficial interests in property.
• Currently instructed in two cross-over cases where issues of financial remedy and probate collide.
• Currently instructed in five farming cases, which include partnership disputes and third party property rights.
Notable Cases
Re W [2016] EWCA Civ 793 (July 2016) – Representation of grandparents on pro-bono basis unled against three silks. Important and leading case in relation to adoption.
Re W (Adoption – Contact) [2016] EWHC 3118 (Fam) – Re-hearing of Re W (below). Appeared against a silk unled.
Re W [2016] EWHC 2437 (Fam) - First instance contested adoption case.
IC v RC [2020] EWHC 2997 (Fam) – Important case in relation to the slip rule and legal principles associated thereto.
SH (A Child) [2020] EWHC 1510 (Fam)
O v O (2020): Finding of fact hearing in private children proceedings where Emily’s client was accused of sexually abusing his step-daughter over a prolonged period of time. Careful consideration and handling of the child witness was required taking account of advocates toolkits and special measures.
W v W (2021): Representation of the respondent in high value and complex financial remedy proceedings in a civil partnership dispute. Significant issues in the case included the respondent’s: (i) substantial pre-acquired assets; (ii) the respondent’s interest in a by-pass trust (c.£1M); (iii) significant inherited assets; (iv) shareholding in a company with a value of £16.6M; and, (v) interest in a newly incorporated company. Expert evidence was required, including in relation to the impact of Covid-19 and extraction of funds for the settlement. The added complication in this case was the short length of the marriage, but also the applicant’s health needs and the potential for ongoing spousal maintenance payable by the respondent. Case settled on a clean break basis, which excluded the majority of the pre-acquired assets.
F v M (2021): Representation of a father contested jurisdiction proceedings in the High Court. The final hearing, which ran over four days, involved complex issues of fact, with multiple witnesses giving evidence from different countries, and complex issues of law (including Qatari law) were considered.
Clerks
Adam Willoughby
Call: 2011
Adam Willoughby
Head of Sports Law & Deputy Head of the Employment Law Team
LL.B (Hons) Law, University of Hull, First Class Honours (2010)
Bar Professional Training Course, BPP Law School, Leeds (2011)
Inaugural Middle Temple Master Rose Scholarship Award (2010)
Middle Temple
Legal Aid Supplier No. 02DXD
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Adam specialises in:
Employment Law
Sports, Media, and Entertainment Law
Business, Property and Probate Litigation
Matrimonial Finance (with an emphasis on commercial and complex pension interests)
Adam has been described as having “an impressive analytical ability, a reassuring manner and a highly effective cross-examination style” who “always delivers impeccable results” (Chambers and Partners).
Reputation
Adam is head of the Sports, Media and Entertainment Team and Deputy Head of the Employment Law Team. Adam is recognised within Chambers and Partners and has recently been noted as:
"Adam Willoughby is deputy head of the employment law team. He is praised for his work in complex discrimination claims, particularly involving vulnerable claimants. He offers expertise across the whole range of employment law, acting for claimants and respondents.He is a very clever chap with an excellent employment practice."
(Chambers and Partners, 2023)
"Adam’s preparation and attention to detail is always first rate. He has an impressive analytical ability, a reassuring manner and a highly effective cross-examination style". "He goes over and above on every case, he has an incredible manner with the clients, and he is such a kind and generous person with his time who always delivers impeccable results". "He is an approachable barrister who is thorough and diligent".
(Chambers and Partners, 2022)
Client feedback has identified Adam as an “impressive and highly effective advocate” with “exceptional analytical ability” and as “tactically very astute”. Adam is a “formidable advocate” with “exceptional intellectual ability”. His written opinions have been described as “clear, concise and thorough” and his pleadings are “consistently very good”.
Adam is also a highly sought after speaker having been invited to speak to delegations in New York, Dallas, Chicago and the UK.
Expertise
Employment
Adam is the Deputy Head of Employment Law and acts for businesses and individual clients both in the Employment Tribunal as well as in High Court commercial disputes arising from the employment relationship. Adam regularly advises and represents parties to appeals before the Employment Appeal Tribunal and Court of Appeal.
Adam is highly sought after across the range of employment disputes, from unfair dismissal and discrimination cases to whistleblowing, equal pay, working time and TUPE issues. Adam also represents individuals the subject of disciplinary and regulatory proceedings.
Adam has established an excellent reputation for advising and representing professional sports clubs and athletes as well as corporate and individual clients operating in the Media and Entertainment industry in relation to disputes arising from contractual relationships and in regulatory and disciplinary matters.
Adam regularly appears in the Queen’s Bench Division and Chancery Division of the High Court in relation to litigation arising from the employment relationship and in relation to claims concerning director and shareholder responsibilities, including:
• Claims for unpaid wages, bonus, commission, and wrongful termination
• Restrictive covenants
• Breach of confidence
• Team moves and springboard relief
• Breach of fiduciary duty
• Shareholder disputes and s. 994 petitions
• Privacy and Defamation
• Intellectual Property
Sports, Media, and Entertainment Law
Adam is the Head of the Sports, Media and Entertainment Group. He acts in a diverse range of high profile and complex cases in the High Court and before tribunals, arbitral panels as well as in disciplinary and appeals panels.
The strength of Adam’s practice lies in his existing expertise in the complimentary fields of employment, corporate and commercial law.
Adam advises and represents sports clients, including athletes, teams, clubs, agents, broadcasters, and international and national sports governing bodies in disputes concerning:
• Commercial and contractual
• Disciplinary and regulatory
• Regulatory governance
• Anti-doping
• Privacy and Defamation
• Intellectual Property
Adam acts for a wide range of artists, performers and media personalities in disputes concerning:
• Privacy and Defamation
• Intellectual property
• Commercial and Contract
• Licensing
• Pre-publication injunctions
• Reputation management
Business, Property and Probate Litigation
Adam acts in a wide range of high value and complex disputes on behalf of claimant’s, defendants, and intervenors. Adam has established a strong reputation in representing and advising clients in the sports, media and entertainment industries as well as individuals and companies in disputes arising from the employment relationship. Adam advises and represents clients in disputes concerning:
• Commercial and employment contracts
• Restrictive covenants
• Team moves and springboard relief
• Breach of confidence
• Defamation and Privacy
• Intellectual Property
• Breach of fiduciary duty
• Claims for unpaid wages, bonus, commission, and wrongful termination
• Shareholder disputes and s. 994 petitions
• Partnership
• Agency
• Equitable Relief
• Professional Negligence
• Trusts, both express and implied, including TOLATA claims
• Family Provision – Inheritance Act 1975 applications
• Wills, Probate & Administration of Estates
Family
Adam has particular expertise in cases which include commercial interests, complex pension arrangements and in cases concerning complex corporate structures and trusts.
Adam advises and represents clients in ancillary relief proceedings from pre-issue to final hearings. Adam is highly sought after in cases featuring overseas assets, offshore accounts, special contributions within the marriage, inherited wealth, insolvency and financial dishonesty, alongside needs-based cases.
In addition to matrimonial finance, Adam advises and represents clients in cases brought under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 and Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
Notable Cases
Fatima v Family Channel Ltd & anor [2020] EWCA Civ 824
Represented appellant in her appeal to the Court of Appeal which considered the interplay between an unsuccessful application to adjourn a trial under CPR 3.1(2)(b) and a subsequent application under CPR 39.3 to set aside judgment against a non-attending party.
Tattu Manchester Ltd v Powell (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the respondent in her response to an appeal to the EAT which considered whether the Tribunal had wrongly interpreted a bonus scheme to mean pre rather than post EBIDTA figures and whether it had wrong concluded there had been a breach of contract.
Jones v. G4S Secure Solutions (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the respondent in its appeal to the EAT which considered whether there had been a dismissal of the claimant following reinstatement on a domestic appeal, considering Roberts v. West Coast Trains Ltd [2004] EWCA Civ 900.
Thomas v Ladbrokes Betting and Gaming Ltd (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the claimant in her appeal brought by the respondent in which the EAT considered whether the Tribunal had substituted its view for that of the employer in finding that the claimant had been unfairly dismissed.
Hunt v. DVSA (Employment Appeal Tribunal)
Represented the appellant in her appeal on the issue of whether the Tribunal erred in its findings that she was not constructively dismissal.
Featherstone Rovers v Griffin
Represented the club concerning breach of contract by a player.
Keith Deller Sports Management Limited v Adrian Jackpot Lewis Limited & Adrian Lewis
Represented Sports Agent concerning claim against a professional darts player for unpaid fees and in its defence of a counterclaim alleging breach of the agency agreement.
Other examples of Adam’s recent work includes:
Representing an RFL club in a dispute with a player who breached his playing contract by having unauthorised dealings with a competing club.
Representing a high-profile professional football player in a claim brought by his former agent in respect of unpaid commissions.
Representing an international rugby player concerning his blocked transfer to another club in Canada.
Representing a professional footballer in a claim against him by a sponsor for breach of the sponsorship agreement.
Representing a multi-national firm in a claim for injunctive relief and damages against a former employee in respect of alleged misuse of commercially sensitive information and breach of restrictive covenants.
Represented a claimant in a petition under s. 994 Companies Act 2006 following her exclusion as a minority shareholder and deprivation of dividend payments. Relief sought was in excess of £19m.
Representing a defendant in a dispute concerning an alleged indemnity to return sales commissions.
Advising and representing an international firm in a claim for injunctive relief and damages against a former employee in respect of alleged misuse of commercially sensitive information and breach of restrictive covenants.
Representing a nationwide motor trading company in its defence of claims of passing off, breach of trademark and copyright.
Advising and representing a high-profile professional footballer in ancillary relief proceedings which included defending the claims of an agent intervening.
Advising and representing an applicant in ancillary relief proceedings in which the key issue concerned a substantial discretionary family trust worth in excess of £30m.
Advising a national publication as to allegations of defamatory statements against a competing publication.
Advising an international food manufacturing company in the wake of public allegations of mislabelling products.
Clerks
Kerry Barker
Call: 2013 (Solicitor 2003)
Kerry Barker
B.A. (Hons), Law & Business (1998)
Admitted as a Solicitor (2003)
Lincoln’s Inn
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02CXW
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Kerry Barker is a barrister who specialises in Family Law. Having previously qualified as a solicitor in 2003, Kerry practices exclusively in this area and represents clients in private law, public law and financial remedy matters. As a solicitor Kerry was a member of the Law Society’s Children Panel and also held her higher court advocacy rights; recognising her position as an experienced solicitor-advocate.
Since Kerry joined Broadway House Chambers’ highly-rated Family Law Team in March 2013 she has developed a busy practice exclusively in family law. As a family law specialist for over 15 years Kerry has built up extensive knowledge in all areas of family law.
Kerry is well known for providing clients with realistic and sensible advice at all stages of proceedings and for conducting hearings in a measured manner. Kerry’s friendly and approachable manner make her a popular choice for vulnerable clients.
“You are a star Kerry. Your thoroughness and attention to detail is appreciated.”
(Bradford Solicitor)
Kerry has considerable experience of cases involving different cultures, which often require an interpreter.
Kerry is able to accept instructions under the Direct Access Scheme.
Reputation
Expertise
Family
Public Law
Kerry acts for clients in difficult and complex cases involving non-accidental injuries, sexual abuse, domestic violence and mental health aspects, and is known for her high competence and thoroughness as an advocate in very sensitive matters at every level in the unified family jurisdiction. Kerry is also instructed by Local Authorities at all levels of public law proceedings.
Kerry Barker has a very busy public law practice which is characterised by representing parties in very complex cases where in most cases expert evidence has been relied upon. Recent cases include significant and chronic neglect, multiple fractures and bruises, and psychological/psychiatric evidence. Kerry has represented Local Authorities and parents in lengthy (10 day plus) finding of fact and final hearings.
Kerry conducts cases involving applications for care and supervision orders; contact with children in care; discharge proceedings; placement and adoption orders; and special guardianship orders. In these proceedings Kerry represents parents, grandparents, children and other interested parties in complex care proceedings. As a solicitor she was also a member of the Children Panel and, accordingly, her experience in representing children is considerable.
Some examples of Kerry’s recent cases include:
- Representation of mother in Public Law proceedings where the Local Authority supported by the Children’s Guardian sought Care and Placement Order. The final hearing included cross examination of expert witnesses where the issues related to the mother’s alcohol use. Kerry successfully opposed the plans of the Local Authority and the court made an order allowing the child to return to the care of the mother under a Child Arrangements Order.
- At a three day interim care hearing Kerry successfully opposed the plans of the Local Authority to remove two children from the care of parents due to issues of chronic neglect. In this hearing Kerry represented the father. The children remained in the care of the parents subject to an interim care order pending further assessments.
- Representation of young mother with learning disabilities in Public Law proceedings where the Local Authority were applying for Care and Placement orders. The final hearing took place over 8 days and included lengthy cross examination of expert witnesses.
- Representation of Local Authority at Final hearing which was heard over eight days. The Children’s Guardian did not support the plans of the Local Authority. Kerry was successful in persuading the court to approve the Local Authority plans.
- Cases involving adoption where applications for leave to revoke a Placement Order and leave to oppose an Adoption Order have been made.
Private Law
Kerry Barker also represents parties in private law cases, including those where there are significant welfare issues. She is regularly instructed in residence, contact, prohibited steps, specific issue order applications and leave to remove from the jurisdiction (both internal and external) and is able to provide advice on discrete matters of law and evidence.
Kerry’s private law practice is dominated by complex cases including issues such as long-standing domestic abuse, allegations of rape and sexual abuse, allegations of violence to children, and removal from the jurisdiction. Kerry is a favorite amongst solicitors for her delicate approach to such sensitive matters.
Some examples of Kerry’s recent cases include:
- Representation of mother in private law proceedings in the High Court. The issues before the court related to competing jurisdictional arguments between UK and Greece.
- Representation of the child within private law proceedings where the issue before the court was one of Jurisdiction. It was being argued that the proceedings ought to be stayed and proceedings transferred to Scotland. Kerry successfully argued that the UK has jurisdiction.
- Representation of father within private law proceedings where the mother had applied to remove the child from the jurisdiction to Pakistan. Kerry was successful in opposing the mother’s application.
- Representation of client within proceedings where the mother sought to relocate over 200 miles within the UK. Kerry successfully opposed the mother’s application on behalf of the father.
- Kerry has dealt with a number of cases involving same-sex relationships and is well versed in case law relating to the area.
Domestic Violence
Kerry is regularly instructed to represent parties before the court in connection with applications under the Family Law Act 1996. Additionally, Kerry also represents parties in applications arising under the Protection From Harassment Act 1997. In this area, Kerry represents both applicants and respondents in cases which involve very serious harm. Kerry’s approachability and friendly nature makes her a popular choice for vulnerable clients.
Notable Cases
A Metropolitan District Council v M & Ors [2019] EWFC 15
Kerry was Junior Counsel, Led by Gillian Irving QC instructed to represent the Applicant Local Authority in which the Local Authority sought care orders in relation to 6 children. The case involved serious allegations of sexual abuse; expert evidence and was heard over 10 days.
C (A Child: Serious Physical Injuries fact finding ) [2018] EWFC 13
Kerry represented the mother at the fact finding hearing which was heard over eight days before Holman J. The issue before the court was who had caused very significant injuries to the child who was just 5 weeks old at the time she sustained her injuries. The mother was exonerated from causing the injuries.
Re W ( A Child) [2017] EWFC B42
Representation of the Children’s Guardian on an application made by the Local Authority for Leave to Appeal. In this case, Kerry appeared against Leading Counsel.
Re B ( A Child: Guardianship Order) [2017] EWFC B39
Representation of the mother in Public Law Proceedings where the court was faced with the decision as to whether to make a Special Guardianship Order or Care Order.
Re P ( A Child) [2016] EWFC B42
Representation of mother in Public Law proceedings where the Local Authority sought final Care and Placement Orders.
Clerks
Laura McBride
Call: 2012
Laura McBride
Deputy Head of the Criminal Law Team
LL.B (Hons), University of Newcastle (2010)
Bar Professional Training Course (2012)
Middle Temple
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02DNO
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Laura is the Deputy Head of the Criminal Team at Broadway House Chambers. Laura accepts instructions in all areas of criminal law as well as cases involving matrimonial assets and private children disputes.
L M McBride LTD trading as Laura McBride
Reputation
- Assistant Legal Advisor BBC National Treasure (2016)
- Disclosure seminars: CPS, South Yorkshire Police, Broadway House Chambers annual conference
Expertise
Crime
Laura is the Deputy Head of the Criminal team at Broadway House Chambers.
Laura is a sought-after trial advocate. Her attention to detail and in-depth understanding of disclosure in criminal cases are second to none. She is a persuasive jury advocate and her reputation means that she is often instructed in serious, complex and high-profile cases, for example, the Rotherham child sexual abuse trials and prosecutions relating to the Hillsborough disaster.
Laura has experience dealing with young and highly vulnerable witnesses and defendants. She has a wide range of experience and has been instructed in cases involving offences of murder, attempt murder, serious sexual offences, human trafficking and fraud.
Her outstanding ability is reflected in her level of experience and success.
L M McBride LTD trading as Laura McBride
Family
Laura accepts instructions to advise and represent clients in matrimonial finance and private family law proceedings from pre-issue to final hearings.
Notable Cases
R v K & ors (2022)
Laura is currently prosecuting a multi-handed robbery alone. Defendants accused of partaking in several robberies over the course of a matter of months.
R v Selby (2022)
Prosecution counsel - The defendant was convicted of aggravated burglary following trial.
R v K (February 2022)
Laura represented the defendant, an NHS employee, who was acquitted of all charges following trial.
R v Hussain & ors (Oct 2021)
Junior in a Rotherham historical child grooming case. Led by Jayne Beckett.
R v D 2020 (Defence)
Defendant was charged with Rape and was acquitted following trial. Use of unused material including telephone logs and medical evidence that had been disclosed in order to discredit witness. Use of vulnerable witness protocols including section 28 procedure.
R v H 2020 (Prosecution)
Prosecuted defendant who was charged with child cruelty against his 2 year old stepson. H was convicted after trial and the case involved use of medical evidence demonstrating causation of injuries
R v B (2020)
Defendant originally charged with attempted murder but was instead charged with Robbery and a Section 18. Defended and led by Rodney Ferm.
Operation Kavaic 1/2 (Sept 2018/July 2019)
Part of operation Stovewood. First operation led by Michelle Colborne KC and second operation led by Ann Cotcher KC. Laura was the disclosure Junior. High profile Rotherham CSE grooming Case.
https://www.rotherhamadvertiser.co.uk/news/view,breaking-child-abuse-gang-jailed-for-a-total-of-101-years_29495.htm
R v Mohammed Nisar Khan & ors (2019)
Disclosure junior in high profile Bradford murder. As a result of the work undertaken, Laura received two awards from the Police.
https://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/news/17610266.mohammed-nisar-meggy-khan-tony-grant-salman-ismail-sentenced-bradford-moor-murder-trial/
Operation Thunder – January 2017
Prosecution Junior led by Sophie Drake (Now HHJ McKone). This case formed part of the investigation into Child Sexual Exploitation in the Rotherham area: click here
Operation Clover 2 – September 2016
Prosecution Disclosure Junior in a high profile multi-handed trial regarding Child Sexual Exploitation in the Rotherham area in the late 1990’s and early 2000’s: click here
R v Hussain and Others [2016]
Disclosure junior in the high profile Rotherham abuse trial.
R v Halligan [2016]
Prosecuted a sentence in a s18 wounding with intent and possession of an offensive weapon. The defendant was deemed dangerous and received an extended custodial sentence.
R v Baron [2016]
Represented a man who pleaded guilty to converting criminal property in a multi-handed fraud trial.
R v Madden [2016]
Represented a man who pleaded guilty to possession of a high number of indecent images.
R v Egan [2015]
Successfully prosecuted a trial of sexual assault on a female and assault.
R v H [2015]
Laura secured a conviction in a racially aggravated public order offence involving the use of an intermediary.
R v P [2015]
Laura successfully defended a private ambulance driver charged with driving through a red light. The case was dismissed.
R v D [2015]
Laura prosecuted a serving Police Officer who was convicted both at the Magistrates’ Court and following an Appeal, a case reported by the National press.
Clerks
Jake Ellis
Call: 2010
Jake Ellis
Deputy Head of the Business, Property & Probate Team
LLB Bachelor of Law - 2:1, LLM Master of Laws – Merit, BVC (Very Competent)
Lincolns Inn
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02ECP
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Jake has very quickly established himself as a leading financial remedy and property specialist and as “a name to watch by instructing solicitors”.
Jake is considered to be well versed in matrimonial finance cases involving trusts, business/commercial interests, inherited wealth and farming assets and is regularly instructed to act in cases of significant value.
As the Deputy Head of the Business, Property and Probate Team, Jake’s finance and property practice extends to complex disputes between unmarried couples pursuant to the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 as well as claims arising out of the Inheritance (Provision for Family & Dependants) Act 1975.
Reputation
The Legal 500 2023 A strong advocate with laser-like attention to detail. He listens to the client and provides clear and comprehensive analytical advice. A barrister who is always prepared to go the extra mile.’
Chambers and Partners 2023 'Jake Ellis is noted for his dedication to clients and cases. He is particularly well versed in handling the financial aspects of separations, many of those involving complex structures such as inherited wealth and farming assets.’
The Legal 500 2022 Guide recommends Jake as “[a]n excellent communicator who provides robust advice. He can turn a complex set of facts into a clear pleaded case. He puts clients at ease straightaway with his very personable approach. ’
The Chambers and Partners Guide refers to Jake as a “…popular junior noted for his dedication to clients and cases. He is particularly well versed in handling the financial aspects of separations, many of those involving complex structures such as inherited wealth and farming assets...”
The Chambers and Partners Guide 2022 attributes the following quotes to Jake: "Nothing is too much trouble for him and he relates well to clients of all types." "Jake goes above and beyond for clients and instructing solicitors." "His manner with clients is fantastic."
Both Guides have recorded Jake as being a “name to watch”.
Jake has had his article “Family Businesses in Financial Remedy Proceedings” published in the Family Law Journal
Jake regularly speaks at Chamber’s seminars, including the Annual Seminar, and is frequently invited by instructing solicitors to speak at seminars and deliver training.
Expertise
Financial Remedy
Jake advises and represents clients in financial relief proceedings from pre-issue to final hearings and is regularly instructed to assist and represent clients attempting alternative methods of resolution, such as at mediation, round table conferences/discussions and private FDR’s.
Jake has experience across the broad spectrum of financial remedy cases but has a particular expertise in cases which include disputes involving trusts, business/commercial interests, inherited wealth and farming assets.
Jake is also available to put his specialist knowledge to use as a private FDR judge.
Business, Property and Probate
Jake has a thriving practice advising and representing clients in cases brought under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 and Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.
Jake’s busy chancery practice blends well with his extensive financial remedy practice, in particular property disputes arising out of cohabitation and challenges to interests in family estates.
Notable Cases
Jake was instructed in a case involving a large property portfolio, held in the UK and abroad and on trust by third parties, and a number of commercial interests, valued at over £17 million.
Jake was instructed in a case that culminated in a 7 day trial, involving two interveners and several witnesses, to resolve a dispute around interests in capital and property held in the UK and abroad.
Jake was instructed in a case that concerned assets of over £2.3 million, which largely consisted of a multi-generational farm and investments inherited by the Applicant Husband.
Jake was instructed to act in a case concerning a multi-generational family farm brought into the marriage by the respondent and associated business established by the parties during the marriage and operated as a partnership.
Jake was instructed in a case concerning the validity of a pre-nuptial agreement and loan agreement in a case where the assets were valued at over £1.3 million.
Clerks
Alyssa Howard
Call: 2014
Alyssa Howard
BA (1st class honours), Trinity Hall, Cambridge University
MA Cambridge University
Bateman Scholar, University of Cambridge (for top 1st in year)
Lincoln’s Inn, Lord Denning Scholar
Lincoln’s Inn, Hardwicke Scholar
Graduate Diploma in Law and BPTC (BPP Law School, London)
Family Law Bar Association
Resolution
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Alyssa is an experienced family law specialist, having exclusively practised in the areas of financial remedies and private children for almost 10 years.
Alyssa has a reputation for being exceptionally well prepared and ‘going the extra mile’ to ensure that her clients have the best representation and advice possible. Alyssa is a robust and effective advocate in Court. Combined with her down to earth and approachable bedside manner, she is a popular choice with clients and solicitors dealing with difficult cases.
Alyssa has a particular interest in complex private children cases and is often instructed in cases involving alienating behaviours/implacable hostility. She is also sought after in financial remedy cases, where her technical knowledge and pragmatic advice have made her first choice for many solicitors.
Alyssa accepts instructions on a public access basis.
Reputation
Expertise
Financial Remedy
Alyssa has significant experience in matrimonial finances cases at all stages of proceedings. Her practice also encompasses acting for Intervenors and Schedule 1 Children Act 1989 matters.Recent work Alyssa has undertaken in this area includes:
• Cases involving the Official Solicitor
• S37 injunctions
• The successful setting aside of a consent order on the grounds of misrepresentation and duress
• Acting for Intervenors in a case involving a large family property portfolio
• Cases involving insolvency
• Financial disputes concerning farming and agricultural enterprises
Alyssa regularly provides advice in these areas, at conference and by way of written opinion.
Private Children
Alyssa has a particular interest in difficult and complex private children cases. She is often instructed on cases involving parental alienation/alienating behaviours and matters which involve serious allegations of domestic abuse.Alyssa is frequently instructed to appear on behalf of clients in a wide variety of Private Children Law cases including Child Arrangements Orders, International and Internal Relocation applications, Special Guardianship Orders and Private Adoption. She is also regularly instructed to provide advice in these areas, both in writing and in conference.
Alyssa is popular with solicitors and clients in high-conflict private children cases. A particular case she was instructed on was described by the expert psychologist as ‘the most serious case of parental alienation I have come across in my entire career.’
Domestic Abuse
Alyssa is regularly instructed in applications under Part IV Family Law Act 1996. She is first choice for many solicitors in these matters, due to her sensitivity and care in dealing with vulnerable clients.
Notable Cases
Anon (2023) - financial remedy proceedings involving a current political figure. Income arguments related to parliamentary expenses.
Re O (2022)– private law children case involving two serving police officers, in a matter whereby the Father has been charged with rape and sexual assault. The case also involved legal argument in respect of adducing evidence of covert recordings.
Re B (2022) private law children case whereby F was imprisoned for stalking and other domestic abuse related offences. Case involving serious allegations of coercive control.
Anon (2022) – financial remedy proceedings involving a well-known retired sportsman. Issues in the case included pension sharing in respect of pension accrued at height of sporting career.
N v N (2020)– private law case which eventually became public law, following arrest of one party for employing others to spray acid at one of the children. Criminal proceedings ensued which attracted widespread national press interest.
P (A Child) [2015] EWCA Civ 1428 – Alyssa acted at first instance and thereafter successfully for her client in the Court of Appeal in a complex private law children matter involving international elements and an ‘abusive’ mother, with an order for no direct contact being upheld by the Court of Appeal.
S (A Child) [2015] EWFC B212 – Private law children case involving unknown whereabouts of Respondent birth parents. Child Arrangements Order made in client’s favour.
London Borough of Waltham Forest v AD [2014] EWHC 1985 (Fam) – Instructed on a case for a Local Authority on behalf of the child requesting a reporting restriction in a case where the Father had killed the Mother. Guidance given by Keenan J as to procedure in such applications.
Clerks
Susan Sanders
Call: 2015
Susan Sanders
MA (Hons), University of Edinburgh, Persian and Social Anthropology (1999)
Graduate Diploma in Law (2014, Distinction)
Bar Professional Training Course (2015, Outstanding)
Middle Temple
Queen Mother Scholar (2014)
Family Law Mediator
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02ENW
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Susan joined Broadway House in September 2016 after successfully completing a mixed pupillage.
She practises family and immigration law and has a particular interest and expertise in the overlap between these two areas. She is qualified to undertake work on a direct access basis.
Susan has an insightful approach and is regularly instructed to represent those who require sensitive and considerate client-care.
Before coming to the Bar Susan worked for human rights organisations and campaigned and carried out research in Afghanistan for Amnesty International. Susan speaks French and Farsi.
Susan is a family mediator and is available to mediate in cases involving child arrangements disputes and financial issues after separation.
Reputation
Articles
Unreasonable law – contested divorce and the case of Owens v Owens
Seminars
- Public Law Children: Deprivation of Liberty (2018)
- Disclosure of Material: Family & Criminal Proceedings (2018)
- Gatekeeping the IAC- Restrictions on appeal rights: Third Country, Clearly Unfounded and Remove First Certificates (2018)
- Trafficking and Age assessments (2019)
- ‘Immigration Applications for Children in Care & Immigration Issues for Kinship Carers/Parents Abroad’ (2021)
- How to prepare for a Deportation Appeal – Family and Private Life (2022)
Legal Directories
Tier 1. Rising Star – Legal 500 2023, “Susan is a very diligent barrister, with extensive knowledge of asylum and immigration law. She is an excellent communicator, and her ability to listen to clients puts them at ease during stressful situations for them. She is pragmatic and clear when giving advice”
Rising Star – Legal 500 2022, “Susan is very dedicated and has in-depth knowledge of immigration law. Her advocacy is thoughtful and measured. She is particularly attentive to the needs of vulnerable clients and quickly builds a rapport with them.”
Expertise
Family
Susan has a busy practice in all areas of family law and represents privately and publicly funded clients from directions hearings through to contested final hearings. She is regularly instructed in private law finding of fact hearings involving serious allegations, including rape, and in public law proceedings for the local authority. She is also involved in cases of domestic abuse, forced marriage, and those with an immigration element. She regularly advises local authorities in relation to immigration issues within public law proceedings.
She is a sensitive and effective communicator. One lay client said she is “absolutely wonderful and very professional with her work, [a] fantastic lady with big experience and commitment”.
Immigration
Susan regularly appears in the First Tier and Upper Tribunals and is committed to providing first class representation to those seeking asylum. She is often asked to advise and drafts judicial review claims as well as applications for permission to appeal.
Before coming to the Bar Susan worked for many years as a legal representative for asylum seekers at Refugee and Migrant Justice and in private practice. She is passionate about representing vulnerable individuals and carries out pro bono advocacy for the Manuel Bravo Project and Bail for Immigration Detainees. Her experience working in Central Africa, Iran and Afghanistan provides invaluable background for this work.
“The clients were very happy with the way the appeal was prepared and presented, [and] asked that I extend the family’s thank you to you. I am attaching a copy of the Tribunal’s decision … the appeal was allowed. This is an excellent result in a potentially tricky case with a long and difficult history" (Instructing Solicitor)
Notable Cases
Family
Re D – Junior counsel in High Court hearing considering allegations of child sexual exploitation
A v A – Finding of fact dealing with allegations of shooting and attempted kidnap
H v H – Finding of fact successfully represented a father facing allegations of sexual and physical abuse. No findings were made.
N v H –Successfully argued for set-aside of a declaration of trust on the basis of fraud at a preliminary issue hearing in financial remedy proceedings
Immigration
JG v SSHD – Successfully appealed decision to deport Jamaican national convicted of burglary, appeal then upheld by UT
EB v SSHD – Permission to appeal granted by the UT on basis of application of European case law to article 3 medical case, pending Supreme Court hearing of AM (Zimbabwe)
GK v SSHD – Upper Tribunal allowed human rights appeal of elderly Indian relative, finding paragraph 276ADE(1)(vi) was met. Appeal had been dismissed by First Tier Tribunal.
Advised EEA extended family member who, as a result, obtained residence permit on the basis of the EU Court of Justice case of Lounes
Clerks
Christopher Styles
Call: 2015
Christopher Styles
University of Oxford
Graduate Diploma in Law (Distinction)
Bar Professional Training Course (Outstanding)
Legal Aid Supplier Number o2EQY
Deputy District Judge
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Christopher joined Broadway House Chambers in September 2015. He is a busy junior practitioner, specialising in the field of public family law.
Legal 500- Leading Junior (2024): ‘Even in the most difficult and complex cases Christopher’s advocacy is calm under pressure- he is an outstanding and persuasive advocate. He has an uncanny ability to think outside the box and find a way forward.’
Legal 500- Leading Junior (2023): ‘Christopher’s strength is his fierce intelligence, and his ability to persuade the tribunal by using that intelligence eloquently and with considered force. Talented…an absolute star in the making.’
Legal 500- Rising Star (2022): ‘He has a meticulous eye for detail, prepares diligently and provides clear, compelling advocacy- one to watch.’
Reputation
Expertise
Christopher is an established family law practitioner, specialising in the representation of parents and children in public law proceedings. He is routinely instructed in cases of gravity- including those involving inflicted injury, sexual abuse, homicide, honour-based violence, cruelty and systematic neglect.
Christopher is an experienced trial advocate and can be relied on to forcefully advocate for clients both in writing and in court. He has a reputation for rigour, with a busy paper practice advising on complex matters of jurisdiction and safeguarding.Christopher understands the unique character of the family jurisdiction. He is trusted by solicitors to advise with both sensitivity and tact.
Notable Cases
Re B: Representation of a child in wardship proceedings in the context of an alleged honour-based killing. Successful jurisdictional argument for child to be permitted to return home.
Re C: Representation of a parent at an eleven-day finding of fact encompassing the cross-examination of a seven year old child. Client exonerated and rehabilitation ordered.
Re B: Representation of a young woman accused of forcibly branding a baby with a cigarette. Client exonerated following a six-day trial.
Re L: Representation of a deaf mother with profound cognitive limitations making allegations of child abuse. Allegations upheld at a nine-day trial.
Re R: Two-week trial representing a parent accused of shaking an eight month old baby. Medical evidence challenged and no identification findings made.
Re F: Representation of grandparents opposing a plan of adoption. Kinship assessment successfully challenged, with the court making findings of exaggeration and distortion against the allocated social worker.
Re S: Representation of a child following threats from a reality TV star to sell case details to News International. Global reporting injunctions imposed.
Re U: Representation of a Ukrainian resident in a High Court dispute regarding welfare, the ongoing conflict and jurisdiction. Interim return to Kiev directed.
Re M: Representation of a father accused of murdering his partner, where the subject child acts as witness for the prosecution. Psychological evidence challenged and placement with family sanctioned.
Re Y [2023] EWHC 2040: Representation of a child in complex High Court relinquishment proceedings - https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/Fam/2023/2040.html
Clerks
Syam Soni
Call: 2015
Syam Soni
Honourable Society of Lincolns Inn
Criminal Bar Association (CBA)
Society of Asian Lawyers
Mentor at Queer Lawyers of Tomorrow
Amicus ALJ
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 / 0113 246 2600
A dedicated criminal defence specialist with a nationwide practice, Syam has developed a reputation for consistently delivering excellence for clients across the spectrum of criminal allegations. From conspiracy to murder to burglary, Syam is fearless in his representation of all clients.
Syam has represented those accused of some of the most serious offences, as well as leading business professionals, CEOs and even nobility.
Syam had a successful career in the banking industry prior to the Bar. He also volunteered on Death Row in Houston, Texas, following which he studied Astronomy and Philosophy in Boston, MA.
Syam is multilingual- fluent in Hindi, Urdu and Punjabi- and authorised to accept instructions from members of the public.
Reputation
Syam has provided training to solicitors, local authorities and universities on a range of legal matters including:
- advocacy/case presentation
- the rules of evidence (bad character, hearsay etc.)
- the disclosure regime and best practices
Syam is part of the South-Eastern Circuit (SEC) delegation due to visit Gainesville, Florida, in 2022 to assist with the training of US lawyers.
Expertise
Syam is experienced both as a led junior and junior alone and is regularly instructed in complex and heavyweight cases including:
- conspiracy to murder
- serious violence (offences up to and including attempted murder)
- rape and serious sexual offences
- serious firearms allegations
- multi-million pound drugs supply conspiracies
Notable Cases
Operation M (Birmingham CC, ongoing): prosecuted by KC in case concerning drugs supply conspiracy worth hundreds of thousands of Pounds
Operation D (Teesside CC, ongoing): representing defendant accused of large-scale fraud targeting vulnerable customers
York CC,2023: represented at retrial a man accused of raping his former partner. Syam succeeded in making targeted and focused submissions as well as robustly challenging the fairness of the prosecution. The jury acquitted within an hour.
Operation S (Central Criminal Court, 2022): led junior in conspiracy to murder, possession of firearms with intent to endanger life, possession of Class A drugs etc. Cross-examined the leading Prosecution EncroChat expert
Operation M (Manchester CC, 2022): defended man charged with multi-million Pound drugs importation conspiracy involving EncroChat
R v G (Leeds CC, ongoing): defending man accused of serious sexual offences against a child
R v C (Basildon CC, 2021): represented defendant charged with possessing indecent and extreme images. Avoided Newton Hearing and secured community order where custody otherwise inevitable
R v B (Kingston CC, 2021): s.18- defended woman with complex mental health difficulties accused of throwing boiling water in the face of a care worker
R v S (Isleworth CC, 2021): acquittal in serious violent disorder (later affray) involving 25 people armed with swords in a residential neighbourhood
R v M (Snaresbrook CC, 2021): secured suspended sentence for PWITS Class A where the expectation was that D would receive a sentence of immediate custody of significant length
Clerks
Christopher Rowe
Call: 2014
Christopher Rowe
M Law Exempting (BPTC), Northumbria University (First Class)
Bar Professional Training Course (Outstanding)
Lawyers Without Borders Intern 2014
Woon Foundation Scholarship (2011)
Honour Roll, Northumbria University School of Law (2012, 2013, 2014)
Inner Temple
Legal Aid Supplier Number 02FD
Contact
T: 01274 722 560 or 0113 246 2600
Christopher is a member of Broadway House Chambers Family Team and Business, Property & Probate Team. He specialises in:
• Financial Remedy Proceeding
• Private Law Children proceedings
• Claims under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996.
Christopher is equally comfortable advising in conference and in writing, as he is in representing clients at all stages of court proceedings including appeal proceedings.
Reputation
Expertise
Family
Financial Remedy Proceedings
Christopher frequently represents and advises applicants, respondents and intervenors at all stages of financial remedy proceedings. He has represented clients in cases involving properties and other assets located abroad, where complex pensions issues arise, and where dissipation of assets and injunction applications feature.
Christopher’s strong practice in TOLATA claims finds him regularly instructed in financial remedy proceedings where intervenors are involved.
Christopher is available to advise both in conference and in writing.
Private Law Children
Christopher has developed a busy practice in private law children proceedings. He is regularly instructed in contested proceedings involving international and internal relocation, parental alienation, and domestic abuse.
Christopher’s prior experience practising in criminal law provides him with particular knowledge where issues of police disclosure arise.
Domestic Abuse
Christopher represents applicants and respondents in non-molestation and occupation order applications, from the ex-parte stage through to final hearings. He has an in-depth understanding of the law and practice in this area, often delivering comprehensive training seminars on cases involving domestic abuse.
Civil
Christopher’s written skills and pragmatic approach assist him greatly when he is required to provide written advices and draft pleadings.
Christopher has developed a strong practice in claims arising under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996. He is regularly instructed to draft all forms of pleadings and to advise in conference including from the outset of potential claims where early advice can be invaluable.
Christopher has also attended numerous small claims, fast-track trials and interim hearings in respect of housing (in particular landlord and tenant and anti-social behaviour matters), personal injury and wide-ranging contract disputes.
Clerks